Home/Supreme Court of New Jersey/Poloha v. Rumane

Poloha v. Rumane

54 A.2d 775, 140 N.J. Eq. 396, 1947 N.J. LEXIS 498
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided September 12, 1947·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Lewis and reported at 137 N. J. Eq. 167.

For affirmance — The Ci-iiee-Justice, Bodine, Donges, Colie, Wacheneeld, Eastwood, Burling, Wells, Dill, McLean, Sciiettino, JJ. 11. For reversal — Heiier, Freund, McGeehan, JJ. 3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Poloha v. Rumane, 54 A.2d 775, 140 N.J. Eq. 396, 1947 N.J. LEXIS 498 (N.J. 1947).

54 A.2d 775 (Poloha v. Rumane) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Naimo v. La Fianza
369 A.2d 987 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1976)
Klockner v. Green
254 A.2d 782 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1969)
Young v. Sabol
72 A.2d 846 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1950)