Poloha v. Rumane

54 A.2d 775, 140 N.J. Eq. 396, 1947 N.J. LEXIS 498
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedSeptember 12, 1947
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 54 A.2d 775 (Poloha v. Rumane) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Poloha v. Rumane, 54 A.2d 775, 140 N.J. Eq. 396, 1947 N.J. LEXIS 498 (N.J. 1947).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Lewis and reported at 137 N. J. Eq. 167.

For affirmance — The Ci-iiee-Justice, Bodine, Donges, Colie, Wacheneeld, Eastwood, Burling, Wells, Dill, McLean, Sciiettino, JJ. 11. For reversal — Heiier, Freund, McGeehan, JJ. 3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Naimo v. La Fianza
369 A.2d 987 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1976)
Klockner v. Green
254 A.2d 782 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1969)
Young v. Sabol
72 A.2d 846 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1950)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
54 A.2d 775, 140 N.J. Eq. 396, 1947 N.J. LEXIS 498, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/poloha-v-rumane-nj-1947.