Polo v. Warner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Polo v. Warner

12 A.D.2d 912, 214 N.Y.S.2d 1012, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12605

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 16, 1961

StatusPublished

This text of 12 A.D.2d 912 (Polo v. Warner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Polo v. Warner, 12 A.D.2d 912, 214 N.Y.S.2d 1012, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12605 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion for leave to. appeal as a poor person granted insofar as to permit the appeal to be heard upon a typewritten or mimeographed record, without printing the same, and upon typewritten or mimeographed appellant’s points, upon condition that the appellant serves one copy of the typewritten or mimeographed record and one copy of the type[913]*913written or mimeographed appellant’s points on the attorney for the defendants-respondents and files 6 typewritten or 19 mimeographed copies of both the record on appeal and appellant’s points with this court on or before March 28, 1961, with notice of argument for the May 1961 Term of this court, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with $10 costs, unless the appellant procures the record on appeal au<l appellant’s points to be served and filed on or before March 28, 1961, with notice of argument for the May 1961 Term of this court, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. Concur—Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Eager and Bastow, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion for leave to. appeal as a poor person granted insofar as to permit the appeal to be heard upon a typewritten or mimeographed record, without printing the same, and upon typewritten or mimeographed appellant’s points, upon condition that the appellant serves one copy of the typewritten or mimeographed record and one copy of the type[913]*913written or mimeographed appellant’s points on the attorney for the defendants-respondents and files 6 typewritten or 19 mimeographed copies of both the record on appeal and appellant’s points with this court on or before March 28, 1961, with notice of argument for the May 1961 Term of this court, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with $10 costs, unless the appellant procures the record on appeal au<l appellant’s points to be served and filed on or before March 28, 1961, with notice of argument for the May 1961 Term of this court, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. Concur—Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Eager and Bastow, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

12 A.D.2d 912, 214 N.Y.S.2d 1012, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12605, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/polo-v-warner-nyappdiv-1961.