Polo v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Polo v. State

619 So. 2d 35, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 6458, 1993 WL 197455

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 9, 1993

DocketNo. 93-01494

StatusPublished

This text of 619 So. 2d 35 (Polo v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Polo v. State, 619 So. 2d 35, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 6458, 1993 WL 197455 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Sergio Polo appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief. We reverse.

Polo claims that forty victim injury points were improperly added to his score-sheet. If Polo’s claim is true, he is entitled to relief. See Karchesky v. State, 591 So.2d 930 (Fla.1992); Morris v. State, 605 So.2d 511 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). The trial court’s order of denial does not conclusively refute Polo’s claim. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for further proceedings in accordance with Morris.

Reversed.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and SCHOONOVER and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI