Polly v. Gumney

147 N.W. 356, 157 Wis. 362, 1914 Wisc. LEXIS 213
Wisconsin Supreme Court·Decided May 21, 1914·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

KeRWIw, J.

There is really but one question on this appeal, namely, whether the findings are supported by the evidence.

It is insisted by appellant that there was a sale of the property and that the deed on its face shows that the transaction was a sale of the land, not a conveyance of it as security for a debt. It is well settled by the decisions of this court that a conveyance of land by deed absolute on its face, when given as security for a debt, is a mortgage. Smith v. Pfluger, 126 Wis. 253, 105 N. W. 476. The evidence amply supports the findings to the effect that the transaction was not a sale of the land, but merely a conveyance of it to secure a debt.

All the findings are well supported by the evidence, therefore the judgment must be affirmed.

By the Oourt. — The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Polly v. Gumney, 147 N.W. 356, 157 Wis. 362, 1914 Wisc. LEXIS 213 (Wis. 1914).

147 N.W. 356 (Polly v. Gumney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Schorsch v. Blader
563 N.W.2d 538 (Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, 1997)
Osipowicz v. Furland
260 N.W. 482 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1935)
M. C. Gehl Co. v. Brahm
187 N.W. 1011 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1922)