Pollock v. Vinegar Hill Zinc Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Pollock v. Vinegar Hill Zinc Co.

99 P.2d 758, 151 Kan. 374, 1940 Kan. LEXIS 121

CourtSupreme Court of Kansas

DecidedMarch 9, 1940

DocketNo. 34,531

StatusPublished

This text of 99 P.2d 758 (Pollock v. Vinegar Hill Zinc Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pollock v. Vinegar Hill Zinc Co., 99 P.2d 758, 151 Kan. 374, 1940 Kan. LEXIS 121 (kan 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

This appeal involves the question of the validity of an ex parte order of the compensation commissioner permitting claimant for compensation to change doctors and hospitals. The trial court set aside that part of the award. The appeal presents no material variation in the facts from those stated in Wolgamott v. Vinegar Hill Zinc Co., post, p. 374, 99 P. 2d 755 (this day decided), and it involves precisely the same question of law.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

This appeal involves the question of the validity of an ex parte order of the compensation commissioner permitting claimant for compensation to change doctors and hospitals. The trial court set aside that part of the award. The appeal presents no material variation in the facts from those stated in Wolgamott v. Vinegar Hill Zinc Co., post, p. 374, 99 P. 2d 755 (this day decided), and it involves precisely the same question of law.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

99 P.2d 758, 151 Kan. 374, 1940 Kan. LEXIS 121, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pollock-v-vinegar-hill-zinc-co-kan-1940.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack