Pollock v. State
666 So. 2d 1016, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 377, 1996 WL 21677
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 23, 1996·No. No. 94-3984·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
We affirm without discussion appellant’s conviction and sentence. However, we strike from the judgment the requirement that appellant pay $27.50 in court costs, listed on the line identified as “Other,” because no statutory authority is cited to support such a cost award, and no explanation is provided as to what this cost represents. On remand, the trial court may reimpose such cost, provided that a legal basis for its imposition is recited. E.g., Bradshaw v. State, 638 So.2d 1024 (Fla. 1st DCA1994).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pollock v. State, 666 So. 2d 1016, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 377, 1996 WL 21677 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).
666 So. 2d 1016 (Pollock v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mitchell v. State
678 So. 2d 1362 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Thomas v. State
668 So. 2d 344 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)