Pollock v. . Pennsylvania Iron Works Company
This text of 51 N.E. 979 (Pollock v. . Pennsylvania Iron Works Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The legal effect of the omission of the defendant at the close of the testimony to move either for a dismissal of the complaint or the direction of a verdict in its favor was to consent to the submission of the case to the jury. We are, therefore, prevented from considering whether the defendant was entitled to judgment. None of the exceptions to the charge call for a reversal.
The judgment should be affirmed.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
51 N.E. 979, 157 N.Y. 699, 1898 N.Y. LEXIS 655, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pollock-v-pennsylvania-iron-works-company-ny-1898.