Pollock v. Muller

30 A.D.2d 946, 294 N.Y.S.2d 980, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3225
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 8, 1968
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 30 A.D.2d 946 (Pollock v. Muller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pollock v. Muller, 30 A.D.2d 946, 294 N.Y.S.2d 980, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3225 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).

Opinion

Order entered December 6, 1967, insofar as appealed from, unanimously modified on the law, the facts and in the exercise of discretion to allow the Receiver as and for his commissions the total sum of $3,483.84, calculated as follows: 1% on $26,200.10, cash on hand when the Receiver entered upon his duties and of which he newly took possession, did not create,, and which was not the fruit of his services, and 5% on the balance of $65,636.76, which includes the sums due from the partners (CPLR 8004 subd. [a]). The fee allowed the attorney for the Receiver is modified to reduce the same to the sum of $4,000. As so modified the order appealed from is otherwise affirmed, without costs or disbursements to either party. In our view the amount of the assets in liquidation [947]*947and the total services rendered by counsel, as revealed in the record, do not warrant the allowance made. Concur — Botein, P. J., Stevens, Capozzoli, Tilzer and McGivern, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re the Arbitration between Arenstein & Huston
142 Misc. 2d 491 (New York Supreme Court, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
30 A.D.2d 946, 294 N.Y.S.2d 980, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3225, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pollock-v-muller-nyappdiv-1968.