Pollock v. Lowry

47 A. 1117, 198 Pa. 117, 1901 Pa. LEXIS 744
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 7, 1901·No. Appeal, No. 97·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

On our examination of the oral testimony and of exhibits A, B, C, D, E and F, we are satisfied that no error was committed by the court in entering a compulsory nonsuit and refusing to take it off. We unhesitatingly affirm the judgment on the able opinion of the learned trial judge.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pollock v. Lowry, 47 A. 1117, 198 Pa. 117, 1901 Pa. LEXIS 744 (Pa. 1901).

47 A. 1117 (Pollock v. Lowry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fife v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
52 A.2d 24 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1946)