Pollock v. Lohman

Missouri Court of Appeals

Pollock v. Lohman

891 S.W.2d 902, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 275, 1995 WL 57455

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 14, 1995·No. No. WD 49678·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appellant, Larry R. Pollock, petitioned the Circuit Court of Boone County pursuant to § 302.311, RSMo 1986, asserting that he had received notice from the Director of Revenue of a ten-year loss of driving privileges as a result of multiple convictions for driving while intoxicated. The judgment denying relief is affirmed as Pollock’s petition does not allege facts entitling him to any 'relief.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appellant, Larry R. Pollock, petitioned the Circuit Court of Boone County pursuant to § 302.311, RSMo 1986, asserting that he had received notice from the Director of Revenue of a ten-year loss of driving privileges as a result of multiple convictions for driving while intoxicated. The judgment denying relief is affirmed as Pollock’s petition does not allege facts entitling him to any 'relief.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Pollock v. Lohman, 891 S.W.2d 902, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 275, 1995 WL 57455 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

891 S.W.2d 902 (Pollock v. Lohman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.