Pollock v. Lippmann

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Pollock v. Lippmann

191 A.D. 923

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 15, 1920

StatusPublished

This text of 191 A.D. 923 (Pollock v. Lippmann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pollock v. Lippmann, 191 A.D. 923 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

Order granting motion to cancel notice of lis ;pendens upon undertaking filed reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Upon the papers before the Special Term the case was not within the provisions of section 1671 of the Code of Civil Procedure. (Tishman v. Acritelli, 111 App. Div. 237; Wolinsky v. Okun, Id. 536; Schenkein v. Horowitz, 51 Misc. Rep. 80; Kennedy v. Hall, Id. 78.) Jenks, P. J., Mills, Putnam, Blaekmar and Kelly, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order granting motion to cancel notice of lis ;pendens upon undertaking filed reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Upon the papers before the Special Term the case was not within the provisions of section 1671 of the Code of Civil Procedure. (Tishman v. Acritelli, 111 App. Div. 237; Wolinsky v. Okun, Id. 536; Schenkein v. Horowitz, 51 Misc. Rep. 80; Kennedy v. Hall, Id. 78.) Jenks, P. J., Mills, Putnam, Blaekmar and Kelly, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

191 A.D. 923, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pollock-v-lippmann-nyappdiv-1920.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack