Pollock v. Lippmann
191 A.D. 923
Opinion
Order granting motion to cancel notice of lis ;pendens upon undertaking filed reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Upon the papers before the Special Term the case was not within the provisions of section 1671 of the Code of Civil Procedure. (Tishman v. Acritelli, 111 App. Div. 237; Wolinsky v. Okun, Id. 536; Schenkein v. Horowitz, 51 Misc. Rep. 80; Kennedy v. Hall, Id. 78.) Jenks, P. J., Mills, Putnam, Blaekmar and Kelly, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pollock v. Lippmann, 191 A.D. 923 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1920).
191 A.D. 923 (Pollock v. Lippmann) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Tishman v. Acritelli
111 A.D. 237 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1906)
Schenkein v. Horowitz
51 Misc. 80 (New York Supreme Court, 1906)