Pollock v. Kingsdown, Inc.

North Carolina Industrial Commission

Pollock v. Kingsdown, Inc.

North Carolina Industrial Commission·Decided January 5, 1995·No. I.C. No. 224693·Published

Opinion

Counsel for defendant moves the Industrial Commission for a continuance in this matter due to the reason that the parties are currently involved in settlement negotiations which depend on an examination of plaintiff by her treating physician which will not occur prior to 26 January 1995.

Upon defendant counsel's motion and for good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that counsel for defendant's motion for a CONTINUANCE is hereby GRANTED.

S/ __________________________ DIANNE C. SELLERS COMMISSIONER

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Counsel for defendant moves the Industrial Commission for a continuance in this matter due to the reason that the parties are currently involved in settlement negotiations which depend on an examination of plaintiff by her treating physician which will not occur prior to 26 January 1995.

Upon defendant counsel's motion and for good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that counsel for defendant's motion for a CONTINUANCE is hereby GRANTED.

S/ __________________________ DIANNE C. SELLERS COMMISSIONER

Pollock v. Kingsdown, Inc., (N.C. Super. Ct. 1995).

Pincite

Pollock v. Kingsdown, Inc. (Pollock v. Kingsdown, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.