Pollock v. Board of Regents of the University of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Pollock v. Board of Regents of the University of New York

277 A.D.2d 808

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 3, 1950

StatusPublished

This text of 277 A.D.2d 808 (Pollock v. Board of Regents of the University of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pollock v. Board of Regents of the University of New York, 277 A.D.2d 808 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1950).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act to review a determination of the Board of Regents, transferred to this court by order of Special Term, Albany County, dated February 3, 1950. Petitioner’s license to practice dentistry has been suspended for one year for violating paragraph g of subdivision 2 of section 6613 of the Education Law. The State Board of Dental Examiners has made findings, sustained by the Board of Regents, that petitioner advertised for patronage by causing to be printed and circulated printed matter with the intent and purpose of obtaining patronage. There is evidence in the record to sustain such findings. Determination of the Board of Regents unanimously confirmed, without costs. [809]*809Present — Poster, P. J., Heffernan, Brewster, Bergan and Coon, JJ. [See-post, p. 825.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act to review a determination of the Board of Regents, transferred to this court by order of Special Term, Albany County, dated February 3, 1950. Petitioner’s license to practice dentistry has been suspended for one year for violating paragraph g of subdivision 2 of section 6613 of the Education Law. The State Board of Dental Examiners has made findings, sustained by the Board of Regents, that petitioner advertised for patronage by causing to be printed and circulated printed matter with the intent and purpose of obtaining patronage. There is evidence in the record to sustain such findings. Determination of the Board of Regents unanimously confirmed, without costs. [809]*809Present — Poster, P. J., Heffernan, Brewster, Bergan and Coon, JJ. [See-post, p. 825.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

277 A.D.2d 808, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pollock-v-board-of-regents-of-the-university-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1950.