Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Pollicino v. New York City Transit Authority

Pollicino v. New York City Transit Authority

172 A.D.2d 841, 570 N.Y.S.2d 906, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7032
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 29, 1991
StatusPublished

This text of 172 A.D.2d 841 (Pollicino v. New York City Transit Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pollicino v. New York City Transit Authority, 172 A.D.2d 841, 570 N.Y.S.2d 906, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7032 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e for leave to serve a late notice of claim, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Garry, J.), dated October 30, 1989, which granted the application.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Under the circumstances of this case, we find that the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in granting the petitioner’s application to file a late notice of claim (see, Matter of Mazzilli v City of New York, 115 AD2d 604). Mangano, P. J., Brown, Sullivan, Harwood and Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mazzilli v. City of New York
115 A.D.2d 604 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
172 A.D.2d 841, 570 N.Y.S.2d 906, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7032, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pollicino-v-new-york-city-transit-authority-nyappdiv-1991.