Pollen v. United States

Court of Claims

Pollen v. United States

58 F. Supp. 653

United States Court of Claims·Decided October 4, 1943·No. 43391·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The evidence submitted by plaintiffs is not sufficient to show what range-keeper devices were either manufactured for or used by the United States within the period beginning six years prior to filing of the original petition and July 10, 1934, the expiration date of the latest patent in suit (findings 12 and 14), and no findings on validity or infringement can be made. The petition must, therefore, be dismissed. It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The evidence submitted by plaintiffs is not sufficient to show what range-keeper devices were either manufactured for or used by the United States within the period beginning six years prior to filing of the original petition and July 10, 1934, the expiration date of the latest patent in suit (findings 12 and 14), and no findings on validity or infringement can be made. The petition must, therefore, be dismissed. It is so ordered.

Pollen v. United States, 58 F. Supp. 653 (cc 1943).

Pincite

58 F. Supp. 653 (Pollen v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.