Pollen v. United States
This text of 58 F. Supp. 653 (Pollen v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[79]*79The court decided that the plaintiffs were not entitled to recover, in an opinion per awriom as follows:
The evidence submitted by plaintiffs is not sufficient to show what .range-keeper devices were either manufactured [80]*80for or used by the United States within the period beginning six years prior to filing of the original petition and July 10, 1934, the expiration date of the latest patent in suit (findings 12 and 14), and no findings on validity or infringement can be made. The petition must, therefore, be dismissed. It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
58 F. Supp. 653, 100 Ct. Cl. 73, 59 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 228, 1943 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 35, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pollen-v-united-states-cc-1943.