Pollatschek v. Goodwin

City of New York Municipal Court

Pollatschek v. Goodwin

16 Misc. 686, 38 N.Y.S. 971

DecidedApril 15, 1896

StatusPublished

This text of 16 Misc. 686 (Pollatschek v. Goodwin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pollatschek v. Goodwin, 16 Misc. 686, 38 N.Y.S. 971 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1896).

Pincite

Opinion

McCarthy, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs for broker’s commission against the seller on an exchange of certain real estate and other properties. ' '

[687]*687The judge’s charge being omitted, we must accept that the case was fairly and properly submitted to the jury.

It was a question of fact, and we cannot disturb their verdict unless for some error of law.

After a careful examination of the points suggested by the appellant we do not find any substantial error requiring a reversal.

Judgment must, therefore, be affirmed, with costs.

Van Wyck, Ch. J., and Fitzsimons, J., concur.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI