Pollard v. State
561 So. 2d 29, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 3362, 1990 WL 64143
Opinion
We affirm the conviction, but reverse the sentence and remand for resentencing. The trial court erred in sentencing the appellant as a habitual offender without making the requisite determination, pursuant to section 775.084, Florida Statutes (1987), that an extended term of imprisonment is necessary for the protection of the public. The newly imposed sentence must be within the guidelines pursuant to Shull v. Dugger, 515 So.2d 748 (Fla.1987).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pollard v. State, 561 So. 2d 29, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 3362, 1990 WL 64143 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).
561 So. 2d 29 (Pollard v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Murray v. State
602 So. 2d 583 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
King v. State
580 So. 2d 169 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)