Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Pollard v. State

Pollard v. State

561 So. 2d 29, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 3362, 1990 WL 64143
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 16, 1990
DocketNo. 89-1651
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 561 So. 2d 29 (Pollard v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pollard v. State, 561 So. 2d 29, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 3362, 1990 WL 64143 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the conviction, but reverse the sentence and remand for resentencing. The trial court erred in sentencing the appellant as a habitual offender without making the requisite determination, pursuant to section 775.084, Florida Statutes (1987), that an extended term of imprisonment is necessary for the protection of the public. The newly imposed sentence must be within the guidelines pursuant to Shull v. Dugger, 515 So.2d 748 (Fla.1987).

ANSTEAD, GLICKSTEIN and POLEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Murray v. State
602 So. 2d 583 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
King v. State
580 So. 2d 169 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
561 So. 2d 29, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 3362, 1990 WL 64143, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pollard-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.