Pollard v. Southern Railway Co.
69 S.E. 28, 8 Ga. App. 337, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 152
Opinion
The allegations of the petition bring this ease squarely within the decisions of this court in Whitfield v. L. & N. R. Co., 7 Ga. App. 268, 271 (66 S. E. 973), and Ayers v. L. & N. R. Co., 5 Ga. App. 454 (63 S. E. 530), and are directly covered by the decisions of the Supreme Court in Worlds v. Georgia R. Co., 99 Ga. 283 (25 S. E. 646), and Freeman v. Savannah Electric Co., 130 Ga. 449 (60 S. E. 1042). The petition was properly dismissed on demurrer, as no cause of action was shown by its allegations. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pollard v. Southern Railway Co., 69 S.E. 28, 8 Ga. App. 337, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 152 (Ga. Ct. App. 1910).
69 S.E. 28 (Pollard v. Southern Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Horne v. Atlanta, Birmingham & Coast Railroad
169 S.E. 760 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1933)
Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Durden
110 S.E. 28 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1921)
International Cotton Mills v. Webb
96 S.E. 16 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1918)