Pollard v. Phalen

53 So. 453, 98 Miss. 155
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1910
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 53 So. 453 (Pollard v. Phalen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pollard v. Phalen, 53 So. 453, 98 Miss. 155 (Mich. 1910).

Opinion

Mates, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This suit was brought in the wrong county, and the demurrer, on this ground, even if there was no other, ought to have been sustained and the bill dismissed. The suit is “respecting personal property” situated in Carroll county, and by virtue of section 561, Code 1906, should have been brought in that county. Having said this much, and because the case must be reversed and bill dismissed on the above ground, we proceed to say that the court should also have sustained the demurrer and dismissed the bill of complaint, because there is a complete and adequate remedy at law.

[159]*159Without prejudice to the parties complainant to proceed in the right way, the decree is reversed, and hill dismissed. ' Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Shoemake v. Federal Credit Co.
192 So. 561 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1940)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
53 So. 453, 98 Miss. 155, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pollard-v-phalen-miss-1910.