Pollard v. Blalock
This text of 94 S.E. 226 (Pollard v. Blalock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
1. This is an action at law for the recovery of land and mesne profits, instituted by a widow suing as sole beneficiary under an existing homestead set apart under the constitution of 1868 to her husband, since deceased. It was erroneous to dismiss the petition on the ground that the action was maintainable only in a court of equity. Hughes v. Purcell, 135 Ga. 174 (5), 175 (68 S. E. 1111).
2. In passing upon the merits of a petition on the hearing of a demurrer, it' is erroneous for the court to take into consideration facts that are not shown by the! petition.
3. The. plea was sufficient as setting up title by prescription, and there was no error in overruling the demurrer to the plea.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
94 S.E. 226, 147 Ga. 406, 1917 Ga. LEXIS 218, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pollard-v-blalock-ga-1917.