Pollak v. Meyer

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Pollak v. Meyer

263 So. 2d 237, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6586

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 23, 1972

DocketNo. 71-1410

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 263 So. 2d 237 (Pollak v. Meyer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pollak v. Meyer, 263 So. 2d 237, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6586 (Fla. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is by the plaintiff below from a judgment for the defendant based on a directed verdict at the close of the plaintiff’s case, in a jury trial in the civil court of record of Dade County.

Upon an earlier trial of the cause a directed verdict was entered for the defendant. The judgment thereon was appealed, and this court reversed. See Pollak v. Meyer, Fla.App.1971, 242 So.2d 796. In the opinion on that first appeal the nature of the case was revealed, and this court held the plaintiff had made a prima facie case. Following that reversal a new trial was held. Upon examination of the record we conclude, as we did previously, that the evidence presented by and on behalf of the plaintiff was sufficient to establish a prima facie case, and that it was error to direct a verdict for the defendant.

The judgment is reversed, and the cause again is remanded for a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is by the plaintiff below from a judgment for the defendant based on a directed verdict at the close of the plaintiff’s case, in a jury trial in the civil court of record of Dade County.

Upon an earlier trial of the cause a directed verdict was entered for the defendant. The judgment thereon was appealed, and this court reversed. See Pollak v. Meyer, Fla.App.1971, 242 So.2d 796. In the opinion on that first appeal the nature of the case was revealed, and this court held the plaintiff had made a prima facie case. Following that reversal a new trial was held. Upon examination of the record we conclude, as we did previously, that the evidence presented by and on behalf of the plaintiff was sufficient to establish a prima facie case, and that it was error to direct a verdict for the defendant.

The judgment is reversed, and the cause again is remanded for a new trial.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

263 So. 2d 237, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6586, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pollak-v-meyer-fladistctapp-1972.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack