Pollack v. Tausig

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Pollack v. Tausig

241 A.D. 622

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 15, 1934·Published

Opinion

Motion granted to the extent of resettling the decision of December 29, 1933 [240 App. Div. 1009], so as to provide that the reference now in progress be continued for the purpose of determining the payments which the defendant Marcus Tausig claims to have made to the plaintiff and which are alleged to be usurious, and that the referee report thereon to the Special Term, together with his opinion. The foregoing is to be in lieu of our decision that there be a trial in Special Term of that issue. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Carswell and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion granted to the extent of resettling the decision of December 29, 1933 [240 App. Div. 1009], so as to provide that the reference now in progress be continued for the purpose of determining the payments which the defendant Marcus Tausig claims to have made to the plaintiff and which are alleged to be usurious, and that the referee report thereon to the Special Term, together with his opinion. The foregoing is to be in lieu of our decision that there be a trial in Special Term of that issue. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Carswell and Davis, JJ.

Pollack v. Tausig, 241 A.D. 622 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

Pincite

241 A.D. 622 (Pollack v. Tausig) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.