Pollack v. Springer
196 Misc. 1015, 95 N.Y.S.2d 527, 1949 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3179
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided December 22, 1949·Published·Cited by 8 cases
Opinion
The prior judgments secured by defendants against plaintiff should have been allowed as an offset to the sum due to plaintiff.
The judgment should be modified by reducing the recovery to the sum of $993.94, together with taxable costs, and as modified, affirmed, without costs.
Hammer, Hofstadter and Pécora, JJ., concur.
Judgment accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pollack v. Springer, 196 Misc. 1015, 95 N.Y.S.2d 527, 1949 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3179 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1949).
196 Misc. 1015 (Pollack v. Springer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re Radiant Systems, Inc.
253 F. Supp. 776 (E.D. New York, 1965)
In re Perfection Technical Services Press, Inc.
22 A.D.2d 352 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1965)
Fore Improvement Corporation, .Appellant v. George R. Selig, Trustee-Appellee. In the Matter of Tru-Seal Aluminum Products Corp., Bankrupt
278 F.2d 143 (Second Circuit, 1960)
In re Tru-Seal Aluminum Products Corp.
170 F. Supp. 902 (E.D. New York, 1959)
Sommers v. Timely Toys, Inc.
209 F.2d 342 (Second Circuit, 1954)
Sommers v. Timely Toys, Inc.
110 F. Supp. 844 (E.D. New York, 1953)