Pollack v. Pollack

290 A.D.2d 547, 736 N.Y.S.2d 628, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 738
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 28, 2002
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 290 A.D.2d 547 (Pollack v. Pollack) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pollack v. Pollack, 290 A.D.2d 547, 736 N.Y.S.2d 628, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 738 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant appeals from stated portions of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Jonas, J.), entered November 24, 1999, which, after a nonjury trial, among other things, granted the plaintiff a divorce on the ground of cruel and inhuman treatment.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the plaintiff demon[548]*548strated through her own testimony that the defendant’s behavior so adversely affected her physical and mental well-being that it became improper for her to cohabit with him (see, Fuegel v Fuegel, 271 AD2d 404; French v French, 262 AD2d 280; Meltzer v Meltzer, 255 AD2d 497). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the plaintiff a divorce on the ground of cruel and inhuman treatment.

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Smith, J.P., Krausman, Schmidt and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cordoves v. Cordoves
11 A.D.3d 504 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Rupp-Elmasri v. Elmasri
305 A.D.2d 393 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
290 A.D.2d 547, 736 N.Y.S.2d 628, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 738, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pollack-v-pollack-nyappdiv-2002.