Pollack v. Pollack

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Pollack v. Pollack

25 A.D.2d 756, 269 N.Y.S.2d 957, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4572

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 4, 1966

StatusPublished

This text of 25 A.D.2d 756 (Pollack v. Pollack) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pollack v. Pollack, 25 A.D.2d 756, 269 N.Y.S.2d 957, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4572 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action for a separation, defendant husband appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered August 13, 1965 after a nonjury trial, as awarded plaintiff permanent alimony and a counsel fee and directed defendant to pay all college expenses of the parties’ minor son, including room, board, tuition and personal expenses. Appeal dismissed, with $10 costs and disbursements, unless appellant files and serves a proper appendix within 30 days after entry of the order hereon. The appendix submitted on this appeal is patently insufficient for the purpose of reviewing the issues of excessiveness of the awards. The trial produced at least 157 pages of transcript, of which the appendix contains 3 pages of disjointed excerpts. (See E. P. Reynolds, Inc., v. Nager Elec. Co., 17 N Y 2d 51.)

Ughetta, Acting P. J., Christ, Hill, Rabin and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action for a separation, defendant husband appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered August 13, 1965 after a nonjury trial, as awarded plaintiff permanent alimony and a counsel fee and directed defendant to pay all college expenses of the parties’ minor son, including room, board, tuition and personal expenses. Appeal dismissed, with $10 costs and disbursements, unless appellant files and serves a proper appendix within 30 days after entry of the order hereon. The appendix submitted on this appeal is patently insufficient for the purpose of reviewing the issues of excessiveness of the awards. The trial produced at least 157 pages of transcript, of which the appendix contains 3 pages of disjointed excerpts. (See E. P. Reynolds, Inc., v. Nager Elec. Co., 17 N Y 2d 51.)

Ughetta, Acting P. J., Christ, Hill, Rabin and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

25 A.D.2d 756, 269 N.Y.S.2d 957, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4572, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pollack-v-pollack-nyappdiv-1966.