Pollack v. Pollack

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Pollack v. Pollack

586 So. 2d 502, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 13895, 1991 WL 193339

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 2, 1991

DocketNo. 91-0117

StatusPublished

This text of 586 So. 2d 502 (Pollack v. Pollack) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pollack v. Pollack, 586 So. 2d 502, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 13895, 1991 WL 193339 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant has attempted through filings and at oral argument to augment significantly on appeal the evidence presented to the trial court. We cannot consider the same as our review is limited to the record made at trial. On the record so made, we affirm.

This court sua sponte strikes filing of evidence at oral argument and directs the clerk to return same to appellant.

DOWNEY, LETTS and WARNER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant has attempted through filings and at oral argument to augment significantly on appeal the evidence presented to the trial court. We cannot consider the same as our review is limited to the record made at trial. On the record so made, we affirm.

This court sua sponte strikes filing of evidence at oral argument and directs the clerk to return same to appellant.

DOWNEY, LETTS and WARNER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

586 So. 2d 502, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 13895, 1991 WL 193339, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pollack-v-pollack-fladistctapp-1991.