Poll v. Mallah

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Poll v. Mallah

267 A.D.2d 442, 700 N.Y.S.2d 861, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13387

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 27, 1999

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 267 A.D.2d 442 (Poll v. Mallah) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Poll v. Mallah, 267 A.D.2d 442, 700 N.Y.S.2d 861, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13387 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Maki Sakuraba appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCarty, J.), dated September 29, 1998, which denied her motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against her.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the appellant’s contentions, the Supreme Court correctly concluded that issues of fact exist as to how this multi-vehicle accident occurred that preclude summary judgment (see, Hudson v Cole, 264 AD2d 439; Suleiman v Speedling, 262 AD2d 397; Sanford v Stillitano, 241 AD2d 489; Omrami v Socrates, 227 AD2d 459). Bracken, J. P., S. Miller, Altman and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Maki Sakuraba appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCarty, J.), dated September 29, 1998, which denied her motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against her.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the appellant’s contentions, the Supreme Court correctly concluded that issues of fact exist as to how this multi-vehicle accident occurred that preclude summary judgment (see, Hudson v Cole, 264 AD2d 439; Suleiman v Speedling, 262 AD2d 397; Sanford v Stillitano, 241 AD2d 489; Omrami v Socrates, 227 AD2d 459). Bracken, J. P., S. Miller, Altman and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

267 A.D.2d 442, 700 N.Y.S.2d 861, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13387, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/poll-v-mallah-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack