Polkinghorn v. Superior Court of San Bernardino Cty.
This text of 168 Cal. 797 (Polkinghorn v. Superior Court of San Bernardino Cty.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this proceeding the petitioner, a creditor of the Gibraltar Investment and Home Building Company, filed a petition for a writ of prohibition arresting, the proceedings in a certain action pending in the superior court of San Bernardino County entitled “The Brookings Timber & Lumber Company, a corporation, Plaintiff, v. Gibraltar Investment and Home Building Company, a corporation, Defendant,” wherein one S. P. Kelley was appointed receiver of the assets of the defendant. On the authority of Elliott, v. Superior Court, (L. A. No. 3949), ante, p. 727, [145 Pac. 101], heretofore decided by this court, in which the order appointing said receiver was adjudged void, it is ordered that a peremptory writ of prohibition issue out of this court as prayed for in the petition on file in the above-entitled proceeding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
168 Cal. 797, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/polkinghorn-v-superior-court-of-san-bernardino-cty-cal-1914.