Polkinghorn v. Superior Court of San Bernardino County

California Supreme Court

Polkinghorn v. Superior Court of San Bernardino County

145 P. 1165, 168 Cal. 797, 1914 Cal. LEXIS 413

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 16, 1914

DocketL.A. No. 3984.

StatusPublished

This text of 145 P. 1165 (Polkinghorn v. Superior Court of San Bernardino County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Polkinghorn v. Superior Court of San Bernardino County, 145 P. 1165, 168 Cal. 797, 1914 Cal. LEXIS 413 (Cal. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

In this proceeding the petitioner, a creditor of the Gibraltar Investment and Home Building Company, filed a petition for a writ of prohibition arresting the proceedings in a certain action pending in the superior court of San Bernardino County entitled "The Brookings Timber Lumber Company, a corporation, Plaintiff,v. Gibraltar Investment and Home Building Company, a corporation, Defendant," wherein one S.F. Kelley was appointed receiver of the assets of the defendant. On the authority of Elliott, v. SuperiorCourt, (L.A. No. 3949), ante, p. 727, [145 P. 101], heretofore decided by this court, in which the order appointing said receiver was adjudged void, it is ordered that a peremptory writ of prohibition issue out of this court as prayed for in the petition on file in the above-entitled proceeding.

*Page 1

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In this proceeding the petitioner, a creditor of the Gibraltar Investment and Home Building Company, filed a petition for a writ of prohibition arresting the proceedings in a certain action pending in the superior court of San Bernardino County entitled "The Brookings Timber Lumber Company, a corporation, Plaintiff,v. Gibraltar Investment and Home Building Company, a corporation, Defendant," wherein one S.F. Kelley was appointed receiver of the assets of the defendant. On the authority of Elliott, v. SuperiorCourt, (L.A. No. 3949), ante, p. 727, [145 P. 101], heretofore decided by this court, in which the order appointing said receiver was adjudged void, it is ordered that a peremptory writ of prohibition issue out of this court as prayed for in the petition on file in the above-entitled proceeding.

*Page 1

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

145 P. 1165, 168 Cal. 797, 1914 Cal. LEXIS 413, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/polkinghorn-v-superior-court-of-san-bernardino-county-cal-1914.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack