Polk v. State

276 S.W. 244, 102 Tex. Crim. 408, 1925 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1157

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Polk v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 109 Tex. Crim. 421 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided December 9, 1925·No. No. 9911.·Published

Opinion

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Upon his trial for hog theft in the District Court of San Augustine County, appellant was convicted and given two years in the penitentiary.

*409 The record is before us without any statement of facts or bills of exception. The indictment charges the offense, and the charge of the court correctly applied the law.

Finding no error in the record, the judgment will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Upon his trial for hog theft in the District Court of San Augustine County, appellant was convicted and given two years in the penitentiary.

*409 The record is before us without any statement of facts or bills of exception. The indictment charges the offense, and the charge of the court correctly applied the law.

Finding no error in the record, the judgment will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Polk v. State, 276 S.W. 244, 102 Tex. Crim. 408, 1925 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1157 (Tex. 1925).

Pincite

276 S.W. 244 (Polk v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.