Polk v. Essen

Missouri Court of Appeals

Polk v. Essen

289 S.W.3d 599, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 384, 2009 WL 764668

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 24, 2009

DocketED 91642

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 289 S.W.3d 599 (Polk v. Essen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Polk v. Essen, 289 S.W.3d 599, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 384, 2009 WL 764668 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Carl D. Essen ("Carl") appeals the trial court's judgment for partition of land that he owned as tenants in common with his sisters, Melinda Polk ("Melinda") and Jennifer Essen ("Jennifer"), and the subsequent sale of his interest to Charter Development Group, LL.C. ("Charter"). We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of *600 law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule $4.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Carl D. Essen ("Carl") appeals the trial court's judgment for partition of land that he owned as tenants in common with his sisters, Melinda Polk ("Melinda") and Jennifer Essen ("Jennifer"), and the subsequent sale of his interest to Charter Development Group, LL.C. ("Charter"). We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of *600 law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule $4.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

289 S.W.3d 599, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 384, 2009 WL 764668, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/polk-v-essen-moctapp-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack