Polk v. Essen

Missouri Court of Appeals

Polk v. Essen

289 S.W.3d 599, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 384, 2009 WL 764668

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 24, 2009·No. ED 91642·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Carl D. Essen ("Carl") appeals the trial court's judgment for partition of land that he owned as tenants in common with his sisters, Melinda Polk ("Melinda") and Jennifer Essen ("Jennifer"), and the subsequent sale of his interest to Charter Development Group, LL.C. ("Charter"). We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of *600 law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule $4.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Carl D. Essen ("Carl") appeals the trial court's judgment for partition of land that he owned as tenants in common with his sisters, Melinda Polk ("Melinda") and Jennifer Essen ("Jennifer"), and the subsequent sale of his interest to Charter Development Group, LL.C. ("Charter"). We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of *600 law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule $4.16(b).

Polk v. Essen, 289 S.W.3d 599, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 384, 2009 WL 764668 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

289 S.W.3d 599 (Polk v. Essen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related