Polk v. Cannon

Delaware Court of Common Pleas

Polk v. Cannon

1 Del. Cas. 40

DecidedNovember 15, 1794

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Del. Cas. 40 (Polk v. Cannon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Delaware Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Polk v. Cannon, 1 Del. Cas. 40 (Del. Super. Ct. 1794).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

No rule for filling up the blanks shall be allowed in vacation; it must be on motion. You must demur in vacation.

N.B. This is directly the reverse of the practice in the Supreme Court, vide Smith v. Newbold. At this term the Court took off several judgments which were entered, sitting the Court, and declared to Mr. Henry in presence of the rest at the bar, “No judgment for non-compliance with the rules can be taken in term time without motion.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

No rule for filling up the blanks shall be allowed in vacation; it must be on motion. You must demur in vacation.

N.B. This is directly the reverse of the practice in the Supreme Court, vide Smith v. Newbold. At this term the Court took off several judgments which were entered, sitting the Court, and declared to Mr. Henry in presence of the rest at the bar, “No judgment for non-compliance with the rules can be taken in term time without motion.”

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Del. Cas. 40, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/polk-v-cannon-delctcompl-1794.