Polk Musical Supply Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Polk Musical Supply Co. v. United States

8 Cust. Ct. 576, 1942 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 626

United States Customs Court·Decided January 5, 1942·No. No. 5542; Entry Nos. 192A and 91A·Published

Opinion

Walker, Judge:

When these appeals to reappraisement, filed by the importer under the provisions of section 501 of the Tariff Act of 1930, wore called for trial at the port of Atlanta, counsel for the plaintiff stated that although they had been filed in good faith diligent [577]*577effort had failed to produce satisfactory or admissible evidence which might be used in the trial of the cases, and he therefore asked that they be dismissed.

Judgment will therefore issue accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Walker, Judge:

When these appeals to reappraisement, filed by the importer under the provisions of section 501 of the Tariff Act of 1930, wore called for trial at the port of Atlanta, counsel for the plaintiff stated that although they had been filed in good faith diligent [577]*577effort had failed to produce satisfactory or admissible evidence which might be used in the trial of the cases, and he therefore asked that they be dismissed.

Judgment will therefore issue accordingly.

Polk Musical Supply Co. v. United States, 8 Cust. Ct. 576, 1942 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 626 (cusc 1942).

Pincite

8 Cust. Ct. 576 (Polk Musical Supply Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.