Politte v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Politte v. State

548 S.W.3d 456

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 5, 2018·No. ED 106035·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

*457Nathan Politte appeals from the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 24.035¹ motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court's findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k); Little v. State, 427 S.W.3d 846, 850 (Mo. App. E.D. 2014). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment and order pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

*457Nathan Politte appeals from the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 24.035¹ motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court's findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k); Little v. State, 427 S.W.3d 846, 850 (Mo. App. E.D. 2014). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment and order pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Footnotes

Politte v. State, 548 S.W.3d 456 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

548 S.W.3d 456 (Politte v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Footnotes

Related