Politte v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Politte v. State

391 S.W.3d 535, 2013 WL 541951, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 181

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 13, 2013·No. No. ED 97975·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Michael Jason Politte appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. An opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b)(2) & (5).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Michael Jason Politte appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. An opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b)(2) & (5).

Politte v. State, 391 S.W.3d 535, 2013 WL 541951, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 181 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

391 S.W.3d 535 (Politte v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.