Polito v. St. Joseph's Manor, Inc.
This text of Polito v. St. Joseph's Manor, Inc. (Polito v. St. Joseph's Manor, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
STATE OF MAINE SUPERIOR COURT CUMBERLAND, ss CIVIL ACTION
NANCY POLITO, individually and 7 DOCKET NO. CV-13 160 REC'D CUMB CLERKS OF1 JAN 16 '18 F'Ml:59 as the Personal Representative of THE ESTATE OF ISABEL POLITO,
Plaintiff
V. ORDER
ST. JOSEPH'S MANOR, INC.,
Defendant
Before the court is defendant's motion to amend the panel findings dated August 23 ,
2017. Defendant requests that the court replace Dr. Thomas Rattan's notation of "NIA" with his
signature on question B. (Ex. A. attached to Def.'s Mot.) The panel findings were mailed to the
court and the attorneys by the panel chair with a cover letter dated September 19, 2017. (Ex. B.
attached to Def.'s Mot.)
Defendant argues Dr. Rattan's notation of "NIA" was a clerical mistake that must be
corrected. (Def.'s Mot. 2.) The court has been given only the written argument of counsel. Even
if additional materials had been presented, the deliberations and discussion of the panel and any
expert testimony are "privileged and confidential." 24 M.R.S. § 2857(2) (2017). The court may
not review the panel proceeding to determine whether Dr. Hattan made a clerical mistake. See
Estate of Nickerson v. Carter, 2014 ME 19, j 15, 86 A.3d 658.
The entry is
Date: January 16, 2018 cy Mills Justice, Superio
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Polito v. St. Joseph's Manor, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/polito-v-st-josephs-manor-inc-mesuperct-2018.