Polite v. Williams

95 S.E. 674, 147 Ga. 820, 1918 Ga. LEXIS 158
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedApril 11, 1918
DocketNo. 716
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 95 S.E. 674 (Polite v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Polite v. Williams, 95 S.E. 674, 147 Ga. 820, 1918 Ga. LEXIS 158 (Ga. 1918).

Opinion

George, J.

A petition was brought by a married woman to enjoin a sale of lands under a power contained in a deed to secure a ■ debt, jointly executed by the wife and husband, upon the grounds that the debt was the debt of the husband and not the. debt of the wife, and that the deed (executed in 1912) was infected with usury. The evidence was conflicting upon each of the issues presented. The case is therefore within the general rule that the discretion of the judge of the superior court in refusing an interlocutory injunction on controverted issues of fact will not be disturbed unless an abuse of discretion is made to appear.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Fish, O. J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dozier v. Mangham
113 S.E.2d 212 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1960)
Ballard v. Waites
21 S.E.2d 848 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1942)
Polite v. Williams
101 S.E. 791 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1920)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
95 S.E. 674, 147 Ga. 820, 1918 Ga. LEXIS 158, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/polite-v-williams-ga-1918.