Polite v. Hedstrom

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Polite v. Hedstrom

392 So. 2d 608, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20458

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 20, 1981

DocketNo. 80-908

StatusPublished

This text of 392 So. 2d 608 (Polite v. Hedstrom) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Polite v. Hedstrom, 392 So. 2d 608, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20458 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant has failed to establish that the trial court abused its discretion in granting a new trial on the ground that the jury verdict was contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence. Cloud v. Fallis, 110 So.2d 669 (Fla.1959); Rivera v. White, 386 So.2d 1233 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); see, Baptist Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. Bell, 384 So.2d 145 (Fla.1980); Castlewood International Corp. v. LaFleur, 322 So.2d 520 (Fla.1975). The order under review is therefore

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant has failed to establish that the trial court abused its discretion in granting a new trial on the ground that the jury verdict was contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence. Cloud v. Fallis, 110 So.2d 669 (Fla.1959); Rivera v. White, 386 So.2d 1233 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); see, Baptist Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. Bell, 384 So.2d 145 (Fla.1980); Castlewood International Corp. v. LaFleur, 322 So.2d 520 (Fla.1975). The order under review is therefore

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

392 So. 2d 608, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20458, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/polite-v-hedstrom-fladistctapp-1981.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack