Polite v. Hedstrom
392 So. 2d 608, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20458
Opinion
The appellant has failed to establish that the trial court abused its discretion in granting a new trial on the ground that the jury verdict was contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence. Cloud v. Fallis, 110 So.2d 669 (Fla.1959); Rivera v. White, 386 So.2d 1233 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); see, Baptist Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. Bell, 384 So.2d 145 (Fla.1980); Castlewood International Corp. v. LaFleur, 322 So.2d 520 (Fla.1975). The order under review is therefore
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Polite v. Hedstrom, 392 So. 2d 608, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20458 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).
392 So. 2d 608 (Polite v. Hedstrom) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rivera v. White
386 So. 2d 1233 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Baptist Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. Bell
384 So. 2d 145 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1980)
Cloud v. Fallis
110 So. 2d 669 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1959)
Castlewood International Corporation v. LaFleur
322 So. 2d 520 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1975)