Polite v. Chaplin

466 F. App'x 208
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 22, 2012
DocketNo. 11-7360
StatusPublished

This text of 466 F. App'x 208 (Polite v. Chaplin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Polite v. Chaplin, 466 F. App'x 208 (4th Cir. 2012).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Stanley Polite seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation .of the magistrate judge and dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006) for failure to state a claim on which relief could be granted. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. Polite v. Chaplin, No. 3:11-cv-02072-CMC (D.S.C. Sept. 19, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
466 F. App'x 208, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/polite-v-chaplin-ca4-2012.