Polite v. Chaplin

466 F. App'x 208
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 22, 2012·No. No. 11-7360·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Stanley Polite seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation .of the magistrate judge and dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006) for failure to state a claim on which relief could be granted. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. Polite v. Chaplin, No. 3:11-cv-02072-CMC (D.S.C. Sept. 19, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Polite v. Chaplin, 466 F. App'x 208 (4th Cir. 2012).

466 F. App'x 208 (Polite v. Chaplin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related