Politano v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Politano v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland

250 A.D. 880, 297 N.Y.S. 159, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9543

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 30, 1937

StatusPublished

This text of 250 A.D. 880 (Politano v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Politano v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland, 250 A.D. 880, 297 N.Y.S. 159, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9543 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

Order in so far as it grants the motion to vacate the ex parte order permitting the applicant to prosecute the surety on the official bond of Jacoby, sheriff, affirmed, without costs. Otder in so far as it denies the motion to vacate the ex parte order permitting the applicant to prosecute the surety on the official bond of McQuade, sheriff, reversed on the law, without costs, and the motion granted on the ground that the principal has been legally discharged of obligation and that the surety is likewise discharged. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Davis and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order in so far as it grants the motion to vacate the ex parte order permitting the applicant to prosecute the surety on the official bond of Jacoby, sheriff, affirmed, without costs. Otder in so far as it denies the motion to vacate the ex parte order permitting the applicant to prosecute the surety on the official bond of McQuade, sheriff, reversed on the law, without costs, and the motion granted on the ground that the principal has been legally discharged of obligation and that the surety is likewise discharged. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Davis and Close, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

250 A.D. 880, 297 N.Y.S. 159, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9543, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/politano-v-fidelity-deposit-co-of-maryland-nyappdiv-1937.