Polisky v. Puget Sound Electric Railway
This text of 204 P. 779 (Polisky v. Puget Sound Electric Railway) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— This is a personal injury action. There was a verdict for the defendant. Plaintiffs have appealed.
The first three assignments of error relate to instructions to the jury, to which no exceptions were taken. Under our uniform holdings they will not he reviewed upon appeal. Worthy v. Arctic Co., 114 Wash. 435, 195 Pac. 222. The’other three assignments of error are that the instructions as a whole are inconsistent, that the court erred in denying the motion for a new trial, and erred in entering judgment upon the verdict. They are in no way argued in the briefs. However,' upon an examination of the record, we are satisfied that none of the assignments • is well taken.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
204 P. 779, 119 Wash. 72, 1922 Wash. LEXIS 1236, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/polisky-v-puget-sound-electric-railway-wash-1922.