Poliak v. Mason

Supreme Court of Florida

Poliak v. Mason

200 So. 95, 145 Fla. 688

DecidedJanuary 24, 1941

StatusPublished

This text of 200 So. 95 (Poliak v. Mason) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Poliak v. Mason, 200 So. 95, 145 Fla. 688 (Fla. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The writ of error brings for review judgment in favor of the plaintiff in a suit for damages resulting from an automobile collision.

It is the contention of the plaintiff in error that under *689 conditions disclosed by the record the plaintiff in the court below was shown as a matter of law to be guilty of contributory negligence which barred her recovery.

We have carefully considered the testimony as disclosed in the bill of exceptions and reach the conclusion that the court did not commit reversible error in denying defendant’s motion for directed verdict. The case was allowed to go to the jury with proper instructions. A consideration of the entire record discloses no reversible error.

The judgment is affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., Buford, Thomas and Adams, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The writ of error brings for review judgment in favor of the plaintiff in a suit for damages resulting from an automobile collision.

It is the contention of the plaintiff in error that under *689 conditions disclosed by the record the plaintiff in the court below was shown as a matter of law to be guilty of contributory negligence which barred her recovery.

We have carefully considered the testimony as disclosed in the bill of exceptions and reach the conclusion that the court did not commit reversible error in denying defendant’s motion for directed verdict. The case was allowed to go to the jury with proper instructions. A consideration of the entire record discloses no reversible error.

The judgment is affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., Buford, Thomas and Adams, J. J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

200 So. 95, 145 Fla. 688, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/poliak-v-mason-fla-1941.