Polhill v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Polhill v. State

103 S.E. 469, 25 Ga. App. 383, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 817

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJune 15, 1920

Docket11283

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 103 S.E. 469 (Polhill v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Polhill v. State, 103 S.E. 469, 25 Ga. App. 383, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 817 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

1. The judgment overruling the demurrer in this case can not be considered, as no assignment of error upon the exception pendente lite, or upon the judgment overruling the demurrer, is contained in the final bill of exceptions, nor was error assigned thereon, by permission of this court, before the beginning of the argument here. A judgment upon the demurrer can not bo considered upon the motion for a new trial.

2. The motion for a new trial is based on the general grounds only, and this court can not say that the evidence did not authorize the verdict. Eor no reason assigned was it error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI