Polhemus v. Polhemus

95 N.Y.S. 325, 108 A.D. 353
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 6, 1905
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 95 N.Y.S. 325 (Polhemus v. Polhemus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Polhemus v. Polhemus, 95 N.Y.S. 325, 108 A.D. 353 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1905).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We are of the opinion that under the authority of Flynn v. Brooklyn City Railway Co., 9 App. Div. 269, 41 N. Y. Supp. 566, affirmed 158 N. Y. 493, 53 N. E. 520; Fitchett v. Murphy, 46 App. Div. 181, 61 N. Y. Supp. 182, and Greaves v. Gouge, 69 N. Y. 154, this action was prematurely brought. There is no allegation in the complaint, and no proof was made upon the trial, that the plaintiff applied to the corporation to commence the action, or that it had refused to prosecute or unreasonably delayed the commencement of the action. The judgment must therefore be reversed, and the complaint dismissed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Polhemus v. Polhemus
114 A.D. 781 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1906)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
95 N.Y.S. 325, 108 A.D. 353, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/polhemus-v-polhemus-nyappdiv-1905.