Poles v. Naviera

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Poles v. Naviera

29 A.D.2d 524, 286 N.Y.S.2d 216, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2779

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 14, 1967

StatusPublished

This text of 29 A.D.2d 524 (Poles v. Naviera) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Poles v. Naviera, 29 A.D.2d 524, 286 N.Y.S.2d 216, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2779 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, entered on June 7, 1967, unanimously reversed, on the law, with $50 costs and disbursements to abide the event, and motion for summary judgment denied. Aside from the issues relating to the terms of plaintiffs’ employment, the record discloses that a claim is made by the defendants against the plaintiffs based on the latter’s alleged failure to render undivided loyalty to the defendants in the rendition of the legal services sued for herein. Under the circumstances a trial should be held. In view of this determination the provision in the order appealed from limiting the scope of the pretrial examinations sought hy defendants should be stricken. Concur ■ — ■ Botein, P. J., Capozzoli, Tilzer, Rabin and McNally, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, entered on June 7, 1967, unanimously reversed, on the law, with $50 costs and disbursements to abide the event, and motion for summary judgment denied. Aside from the issues relating to the terms of plaintiffs’ employment, the record discloses that a claim is made by the defendants against the plaintiffs based on the latter’s alleged failure to render undivided loyalty to the defendants in the rendition of the legal services sued for herein. Under the circumstances a trial should be held. In view of this determination the provision in the order appealed from limiting the scope of the pretrial examinations sought hy defendants should be stricken. Concur ■ — ■ Botein, P. J., Capozzoli, Tilzer, Rabin and McNally, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

29 A.D.2d 524, 286 N.Y.S.2d 216, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2779, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/poles-v-naviera-nyappdiv-1967.