Poledor Corporation v. Happ
This text of 164 N.E. 925 (Poledor Corporation v. Happ) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This was an action brought by the appellee against the appellant to recover commissions alleged to be due for securing the lease and tenant for certain rooms in a building owned by the appellant in South Bend, Indiana.
The complaint is based upon an oral contract and the errors relied upon for reversal are that the decision of the court is not sustained by sufficient evidence and the decision of the court is contrary to law.
There is ample evidence to support the finding of the court on the questions of fact. See Lahr v. Broyles (1927), 86 Ind. App. 33, 155 N. E. 709.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
164 N.E. 925, 88 Ind. App. 709, 1929 Ind. App. LEXIS 41, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/poledor-corporation-v-happ-indctapp-1929.