Poledor Corporation v. Happ

Indiana Court of Appeals

Poledor Corporation v. Happ

164 N.E. 925, 88 Ind. App. 709, 1929 Ind. App. LEXIS 41

Indiana Court of Appeals·Decided January 25, 1929·No. No. 13,251.·Published

Opinion

Lockyear, J.

This was an action brought by the appellee against the appellant to recover commissions alleged to be due for securing the lease and tenant for certain rooms in a building owned by the appellant in South Bend, Indiana.

The complaint is based upon an oral contract and the errors relied upon for reversal are that the decision of the court is not sustained by sufficient evidence and the decision of the court is contrary to law.

There is ample evidence to support the finding of the court on the questions of fact. See Lahr v. Broyles (1927), 86 Ind. App. 33, 155 N. E. 709.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lockyear, J.

This was an action brought by the appellee against the appellant to recover commissions alleged to be due for securing the lease and tenant for certain rooms in a building owned by the appellant in South Bend, Indiana.

The complaint is based upon an oral contract and the errors relied upon for reversal are that the decision of the court is not sustained by sufficient evidence and the decision of the court is contrary to law.

There is ample evidence to support the finding of the court on the questions of fact. See Lahr v. Broyles (1927), 86 Ind. App. 33, 155 N. E. 709.

Judgment affirmed.

Poledor Corporation v. Happ, 164 N.E. 925, 88 Ind. App. 709, 1929 Ind. App. LEXIS 41 (Ind. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

164 N.E. 925 (Poledor Corporation v. Happ) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related