Polcsa v. East River Management Corp.
This text of 8 Misc. 2d 798 (Polcsa v. East River Management Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The refusal of the trial court to receive in evidence portions of a hospital record relating to prior diagnosis of swollen ankle and severe headaches was error, particularly in view of plaintiff’s claim that she had never had previous trouble with her feet and that her swollen ankles and persistent headaches were the result of the accident upon which this suit was based. Hospital records which relate to diagnosis, prognosis or treatment or which are otherwise helpful to an understanding of the medical aspects of the hospitalization are admissible in evidence. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 374-a; William v. Alexander, 309 N. Y. 283.)
The judgment should be reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.
Judgment reversed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
8 Misc. 2d 798, 160 N.Y.S.2d 658, 1957 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3294, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/polcsa-v-east-river-management-corp-nysupct-1957.