Polche v. McGuire

96 A.D.2d 475, 465 N.Y.S.2d 5, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18973
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 7, 1983
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 96 A.D.2d 475 (Polche v. McGuire) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Polche v. McGuire, 96 A.D.2d 475, 465 N.Y.S.2d 5, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18973 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Opinions

— Order, Supreme Court, New York County (M. A. Gomez, J.), entered January 29, 1982, granting petition to extent of directing a trial on the issue of causation, and directing respondents to pay the outstanding bills of Irving Glass, M.D., and all future medical treatments by Dr. Glass referrable to the injury until the issue of causation is finally determined, is reversed, on the law, without costs, and the petition is dismissed. The determination of the Board of Trustees of the Police Pension Fund to deny petitioner accident disability retirement based upon the recommendation of the medical board, was not arbitrary or capricious. The medical board’s recommendation and study of the matter, and the history of the case, sufficiently supported the determination that petitioner’s disability was not caused by his line-of-duty injury in 1948. The issue of causation is a matter confided to the Board of Trustees of the Police Pension Fund and is not a matter for the courts to determine. The court’s role is limited only to determining whether the trustees’ determination was arbitrary or capricious. As the obligation of the city to pay for medical expenses of an officer extends only to treatment for injuries incurred in the discharge of duty (Administrative Code of City of New York, § B49-10.0), there [476]*476was no obligation on the part of the city to pay a physician for services rendered in connection with a condition which the medical board and the Board of Trustees of the Police Pension Fund have determined not to be incurred in the discharge of duty. Concur — Silverman, Bloom, Milonas and Kassal, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Quill v. Ward
138 A.D.2d 305 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
96 A.D.2d 475, 465 N.Y.S.2d 5, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18973, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/polche-v-mcguire-nyappdiv-1983.