Polche v. McGuire

460 N.E.2d 227, 61 N.Y.2d 663, 472 N.Y.S.2d 86, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 3615
New York Court of Appeals·Decided December 20, 1983·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs. Inasmuch as it cannot be determined on the record in this case that appellant was entitled to accidental disability benefits as a matter of law, the determination of respondent board of trustees will not be disturbed. (Matter of Canfora v Board of Trustees of Police Pension Fund, 60 NY2d 347.)

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of ‘the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Polche v. McGuire, 460 N.E.2d 227, 61 N.Y.2d 663, 472 N.Y.S.2d 86, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 3615 (N.Y. 1983).

460 N.E.2d 227 (Polche v. McGuire) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Quill v. Ward
138 A.D.2d 305 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)