Polche v. McGuire

New York Court of Appeals

Polche v. McGuire

460 N.E.2d 227, 61 N.Y.2d 663, 472 N.Y.S.2d 86, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 3615

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 20, 1983

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 460 N.E.2d 227 (Polche v. McGuire) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Polche v. McGuire, 460 N.E.2d 227, 61 N.Y.2d 663, 472 N.Y.S.2d 86, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 3615 (N.Y. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs. Inasmuch as it cannot be determined on the record in this case that appellant was entitled to accidental disability benefits as a matter of law, the determination of respondent board of trustees will not be disturbed. (Matter of Canfora v Board of Trustees of Police Pension Fund, 60 NY2d 347.)

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of ‘the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI