Polcaro v. City of East Orange

310 A.2d 463, 63 N.J. 548, 1973 N.J. LEXIS 215
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided February 13, 1973·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This matter having been duly presented to the Court, it is Ordered that

Application for certification having been made and heard orally, and it appearing to the Court that this order should be made.

It is Ordered that certification is granted (62 N. J. 335), and that the judgment of the Appellate Division, 121 N. J. Super. 325 is reversed and the matter remanded to the Division of Workmen’s Compensation with directions (1) to try and determine the question whether the injuries sustained in the employment prevented the claimant from making a seasonable application to reopen, or a seasonable application for compensation for increased disability, and (2) to try the remaining issues if the claimant prevails on the timeliness issue stated in (1).

For reversal and remandment — Chief Justice Weintraub and Justices Jacobs, Hall and Mountain and Judges Con-ford, Sullivan and Lewis — 7.

Opposed — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Polcaro v. City of East Orange, 310 A.2d 463, 63 N.J. 548, 1973 N.J. LEXIS 215 (N.J. 1973).

310 A.2d 463 (Polcaro v. City of East Orange) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services
9 A.3d 882 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2010)
Bey v. Truss Systems, Inc.
823 A.2d 58 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2003)
Dugan v. Fujitsu Business Communications Systems, Inc.
937 P.2d 706 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1997)